User agent detail

KWC-laylo/AAR1004 UP.Browser/7.2.7.2.531 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Kyoceralaylo Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2 Mobile Phoneyes0.18202 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
KWC-laylo AAR1004closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.7.2.531close KyoceraM1400mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2 Kyoceralaylosmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 7.2.7close Kyoceralaylocloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.7.2.531 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.56806 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 7.2 Kyoceralaylomobile:featureyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close KyoceraM1400Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:50 | by ThaDafinser