User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_1) AppleWebKit/600.2.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/8.0.2 Safari/600.2.5 (Applebot/0.1; +http://www.apple.com/go/applebot)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-826.php
yesApplebotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesApplebotBot/Crawler0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 8.0.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 8.0.2closeOS X 10.10.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesApplebotCrawler0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesApplebotclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 8.0.2closeOS X 10.10.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 8.0.2WebKit 600.2.5Mac OS X 10.10.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 8.0.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:49 | by ThaDafinser