User agent detail

SonyEricssonP700i/R100 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Symbian OS; 513) Opera 8.65 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonP700i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.65Presto Symbian OS Sony EricssonP700ifeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.65close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS SonyEricssonP700icloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.65closeSymbian OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.65 Symbian Sony EricssonSony Ericsson P700icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 8.65 Sony EricssonP700imobile:featureyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonP700iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:49 | by ThaDafinser