User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_1 like Mac OS X; xx) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) CriOS/23.0.1271.100 Mobile/9B176 Safari/7534.48.3 (AD5080E1-ED62-4654-A8AA-1C36DF3B6BFD)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome 23iOS 5.1Webkit 534.46AppleiPadtabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 23.0WebKit iOS 5.1AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.04601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.100closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 23.0.1271.100closeiOS 5.1AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile iOS 23.0WebKit iOS 5.1AppleiPadtabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.100closeiOS 5.1closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile iOS 23.0.1271closeiOS 5.1AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 23.0.1271.100WebKit 534.46iOS 5.1AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 23Webkit 534.46iOS 5.1AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.100closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1.1closeiOS 5.1.1AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:48 | by ThaDafinser