User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Iron/31.0.1700.0 Chrome/31.0.1700.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-323.php
Iron 31.0MacOSX 10.9unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Iron 31.0Blink MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.09401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1700.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Iron 31.0.1700.0closeOS X 10.9.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Iron 31.0Blink Mac 10.9desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1700.0closeOS X 10.9.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iron 31.0.1700closeMac OS X 10.9.3closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iron 31.0.1700.0closeOS X 10.9.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
SRWare Iron 31.0.1700.0WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.9.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iron 31.0Blink OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1700.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:24:48 | by ThaDafinser