User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; M-MP860S2 Build/IMM76I) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.116 Safari/537.36 OPR/21.0.1437.74904

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 21.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 21.0.1437.74904closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 21.0Blink Android 4.0MediacomSmartPad 860 S2tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 21.0.1437.74904closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 21.0.1437closeAndroid 4.0.4MediacomM-MP860S2closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 21.0Blink 537.36Android 4.0.4MediacomSmartPad 860 S2tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 21.0.1437.74904closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:25 | by ThaDafinser