User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Tizen 2.2.1.3; SAMSUNG SM-R750A) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/2.2.1.3 Mobile Safari/538.1

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Samsung WebView 2.2WebKit Tizen 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 2.2.1.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Safari 2.2WebKit Tizen 2.2SamsungSM-R750Asmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 2.2.1.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 2.2.1closeLinux SamsungSM-R750Acloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 538.1Tizen 2.2.1.3SamsungGear Swatchyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 2.2.1.3closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 34.0.1847.76closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:26 | by ThaDafinser