User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-I8320-Vodafone/I8320BUJC1 Linux/X2/R1 Opera/9.6 SMS-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 9.6Presto GNU/Linux SamsungH1smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.6closeLinux SamsungGT-I8320-Vodafonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile 9.6 LiMo Vodafone360 H1mobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.6closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet closeLinux SamsungGT-I8320Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:26 | by ThaDafinser