User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.71 Safari/537.36 OPR/15.0.1147.138

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 15.0Blink WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 15.0.1147.138closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 15.0Blink Windows XPdesktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 15.0.1147.138closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 15.0.1147closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 15.0Blink 537.36Windows XPdesktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 15.0.1147.138closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 15.0.1147.18closeMac OS X 10.8.3Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:26 | by ThaDafinser