User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.2; U; Series60/3.1 LGKT610/v10A; Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML; like Gecko) Safari/413

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.1LGKT610smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1closeSymbian OS 9.2LGKT610closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 413Series60 3.1LGKT610mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.2LGKT610Feature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:26 | by ThaDafinser