User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0.2; BRAVIA 2015 Build/LGY75.S91; wv) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/42.0.2311.138 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 5.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.138closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 42.0Blink Android 5.0LGY75smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.138closeAndroid 5.0.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311closeAndroid 5.0.2BRAVIA 2015closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chromium WebView 42Blink 537.36Android TV 5.0.2SonyBravia Android TV (2015)televisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.138closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 38closeAndroid 5.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:27 | by ThaDafinser