User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; zh-cn; SUNVAN S8888A Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/6.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
QQ Browser 6.0WebKit Android 4.4SunVanS8888Asmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 6.0closeAndroid 4.4.2SUNVAN S8888Acloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
QQ Browser 6.0Webkit 537.36Android 4.4.2SUNVAN S8888Amobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:28 | by ThaDafinser