User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1; LGV32 Build/LMY47D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/38.0.2125.102 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 38.0Blink Android 5.1LGV32smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 5.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 38.0.2125closeAndroid 5.1LGV32closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
LG Browser Blink 537.36Android 5.1LGisai vivid LGV32mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 38closeAndroid 5.1LGV32Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:28 | by ThaDafinser