User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; BRAVIA 2015 Build/LGZ23.S49) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.101 Safari/537.36 OPR/28.0.1754.0 OMI/4.4.22.20.E102586-1.98

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 28.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 28.0.1754.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 28.0Blink GNU/Linux LGZ23smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 28.0.1754.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 28.0.1754closeLinux closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Devices 4.4Blink 537.36Android TV SonyBravia Android TV (2015)televisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 28.0.1754.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 28.0.1750.31closeMac OS X 10.10.1Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:29 | by ThaDafinser