User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; ONE TOUCH EVO7HD Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.58 Safari/537.31

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 26.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.58closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 26.0WebKit Android 4.1AlcatelOne Touch EVO7HDtabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.58closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 26.0.1410closeAndroid 4.1.1AlcatelOne Touch EVO7HDcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome Dev 26.0.1410.58Webkit 537.31Android 4.1.1AlcatelOne Touch Evo 7 HDtabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.58closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:30 | by ThaDafinser