User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/4.0.202.0 Safari/532.0

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 4.0WebKit MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 4.0.202.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 4.0WebKit Mac 10.5desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 4.0.202.0closeOS X 10.5.8closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 4.0.202closeMac OS X 10.5.8closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome Dev 4.0.202.0Webkit 532.0Mac OS X 10.5desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 4.0.202.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 4.0.249.25closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:31 | by ThaDafinser