User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1664.3 Safari/537.36 OPR/19.0.1300.0 (Edition Developer)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 19.0Blink WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 19.0.1300.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 19.0Blink Windows XPdesktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 19.0.1300.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 19.0.1300closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Developer 19.0Blink 537.36Windows XPdesktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 19.0.1300.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:32 | by ThaDafinser