User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS armv7l 7520.42.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/47.0.2526.59 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 47.0Blink ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 47.0.2526.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 47.0Blink Chrome OS 7520.42desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 47.0.2526.59closeChrome OS 47.0.2526.59closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 47.0.2526closeChrome OS 7520.42.0closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 47Blink 537.36Chrome OS desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 47.0.2526.59closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:33 | by ThaDafinser