User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS x86_64 4731.101.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.67 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 31.0Blink ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.67closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 31.0Blink Chrome OS 4731.101desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.67closeChrome OS 31.0.1650.67closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeChrome OS 4731.101.0closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 31Blink 537.36Chrome OS desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.67closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 31.0.1650.48closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:33 | by ThaDafinser