User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_1_3 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/10B329 Safari/7534.48.3 Sleipnir/2.4.5m

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS 6.1AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7534.48.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Sleipnir 2.4WebKit iOS 6.1AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 6.1.3closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Sleipnir 2.4.5closeiOS 6.1.3AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Sleipnir 2.4.5Webkit 536.26iOS 6.1.3AppleiPhonemobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.1.5AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:33 | by ThaDafinser