User agent detail

MOT-RAZRV3xx/96.B0.0FR BER2.2 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; 11073256) Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Opera 8.00 [en]

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 8.00Presto 2.2WinMobile Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 8.00Presto MotorolaRAZRV3xxsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.00close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.0close MotorolaRAZRV3xxcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mini MotorolaRAZRV3xxmobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaRAZR V3xxFeature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:33 | by ThaDafinser