User agent detail

emobile/1.0.0 (H11T; like Gecko; Wireless) NetFront/3.4

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
emobile 1.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
NetFront 3.4NetFront Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
NetFront 3.4 ToshibaH11Tmobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
emobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.4close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.4Feature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:34 | by ThaDafinser