User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Cyclone Voyager 2 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.82 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.2SumvisionCyclone Voyager 2tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 30.0.1599closeAndroid 4.2.2Cyclone Voyager 2closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 30Blink 537.36Android 4.2.2SumvisionCyclone Voyager 2tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:36 | by ThaDafinser