User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0(compatible; U; InfiNet 0.1; Viera) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko)(avdn/Panasonic.tv.2011;avvp/ssl;avui/tv;avrt/html5;avkb/mcr,P:113,PU:114,S:115,SF:116,SB:117,ST:112;avst/on)

Detected by 5 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
PanasonicCoastsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0(compatible;close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 420 PanasonicViera 2011televisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:38 | by ThaDafinser