User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS i686 2268.111.0) AppleWebKit/536.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/20.0.1132.57 Safari/536.11

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 20.0WebKit ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 20.0.1132.57closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 20.0WebKit Chrome OS 2268.111desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 20.0.1132.57closeChrome OS 20.0.1132.57closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 20.0.1132closeChrome OS 2268.111.0closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 20Webkit 536.11Chrome OS desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 20.0.1132.57closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 20.0.1132.57closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:38 | by ThaDafinser