User agent detail

SonyEricssonJ108i/R7EA Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0 UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; xx; SonyEricssonJ108i) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.0.342 U2/1.0.0 Mobile

Detected by 6 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 1 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
yesGeneral CrawlersCrawler Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonJ108i R7EAcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 9.4 Sony EricssonCedarfeature phoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.0close SonyEricssonJ108icloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 9.4Gecko Sony EricssonCedarmobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.5close SonyEricssonJ108iFeature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:40 | by ThaDafinser