User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Fedora; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/601.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/8.0 Safari/601.1 Epiphany/3.16.3

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Safari 8.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Epiphany 3.16WebKit Fedora desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 8.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 3.16.3closeFedora closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
GNOME Web 3.16.3Webkit 601.1Fedora desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:41 | by ThaDafinser