User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.3.1; TF300T Build/JLS36I) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.117 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.3Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.117closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.3AsusTransformer Pad TF300Ttabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.117closeAndroid 4.3.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.3.1AsusTF300Tcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 35Blink 537.36Android 4.3.1AsusTransformer Pad 300tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.117closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 28closeAndroid 4.3Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:41 | by ThaDafinser