User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; zh-cn; MI-ONE_Plus Build/GINGERBREAD; 480*854) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1/UCWEB7.9.3.103/139/800

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 3.1WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 2.3XiaomiMI-ONE Plussmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.3closeAndroid 2.3.5XiaoMiMI-ONE_Pluscloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 7.9Webkit 528.5Android 2.3.5XiaomiMi 1mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:42 | by ThaDafinser