User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.4; en-us; Silk/1.0.22.153_10033210) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1 Silk-Accelerated=true

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Silk 1.0WebKit Android AmazonKindleEbook Readeryesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 1.0.22.153closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Silk 1.0Blink Android 2.3AmazonKindle Firetabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 1.0.22closeAndroid 2.3.4AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Silk 1.0Webkit 533.1FireOS AmazonKindle Firetabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 1.1closeMac OS X 10.6.3AmazonD01400Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:43 | by ThaDafinser