User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (QtEmbedded; U; Linux; C) AppleWebKit/533.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) ADAPI/1.0 (UUID:f9d65c88-e4cd-43b4-89eb-d0aeecbbbbbf; NAME:d0aeecbbbbbf) SMP864X-ADAPI/3.3.27 (MODEL:XMP-3250) Safari/533.3

Detected by 6 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 533.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Adapi 1.0Webkit 533.3 IAdeaXMP-3250signagecloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:44 | by ThaDafinser