User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPod touch; CPU iPhone OS 7_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0 Mobile/11A465 Safari/9537.53

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Safari 7.0WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Safari 7.0WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPod Touchportable media playeryes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 7.0closeiOS 7.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 7.0closeiOS 7.0AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Safari Webkit 537.51.1iOS 7.0AppleiPod touchmediayescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 7.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 7.0closeiOS AppleiPod TouchOther Mobileyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:45 | by ThaDafinser