User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.3; Series60/3.2 VertuConstellationQuest/051.844.1; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) NokiaBrowser/7.3.1.26 Mobile Safari/533.4

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Nokia Browser 7.3WebKit SymbianOS NokiaMobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 533.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Nokia Browser 7.3WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.2NokiaBrowsersmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 7.3.1.26closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.3.1closeSymbian OS 9.3NokiaBrowsercloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Nokia Browser 7.3.1Webkit 533.4Series60 3.2VertuConstellation Questmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.1NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:46 | by ThaDafinser