User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.2; zh-CN; ZTE-C_N780 Build/FRF91) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1 UCBrowser/8.8.3.272 Mobile

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 8.8WebKit Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 8.8WebKit Android 2.2ZTEC N780smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.8.3closeAndroid 2.2.2ZTEC_N780closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 8.8Webkit 528.5Android 2.2.2ZTEN780mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:46 | by ThaDafinser