User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Mobile; Windows Phone 8.1; Android 4.0; ARM; Trident/7.0; Touch; rv:11.0; IEMobile/11.0; SAMSUNG; SPH-I800; Chameleon) like iPhone OS 7_0_3 Mac OS X AppleWebKit/537 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/537

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
IEMobile 11.0Trident 7.0WinPhone8.1 8.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
IE Mobile 11.0Trident Windows Phone 8.1AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeiOS closeWindows Phonecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 11.0closeWindows Phone 8.1SamsungSPH-I800closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Mobile Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Phone 8.1SamsungAtiv S Neomobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 11.0closeWindows Phone 8.1SamsungSPH-I800Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:47 | by ThaDafinser