User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1.1; E6853 Build/32.0.A.6.115) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/44.0.2403.133 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 44.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.133closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 44.0Blink Android 5.1smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.133closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403closeAndroid 5.1.1SonyEricssonE6853closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 44Blink 537.36Android 5.1.1SonyXperia Z5 Premiummobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.133closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 5.1SonyE6853Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:47 | by ThaDafinser