User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (BREW; U; BREW 3.1.5; xx) AppleWebKit/525.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Polaris/7.0 Safari/525.26 480X800 LGE VX11000

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 525.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Polaris 7.0WebKit Brew 3.1LGVX11000smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 7.0closeBREW 3.1.5LGVX11000closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Polaris 7.0Webkit 525.26Brew 3.1.5LGEnv Touchmobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux LGVX 11000Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:47 | by ThaDafinser