User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.2; Series60/3.1 Samsung/SGH-i550/XXHH1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 U; ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Safari SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.1SamsungSGH-i550smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1closeSymbian OS 9.2SamsungSGH-i550closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 413Series60 3.1Samsungi550mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.2SamsungSGH G810Feature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:48 | by ThaDafinser