User agent detail

ETON-D510_TD/1.0 Linux/2.6.35.7 Android/2.3.5 Release/01.01.2012 Browser/AppleWebKit533.1 Mozilla/5.0 Mobile

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ETON-D510 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3EtonD510smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.3.5closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5ETON-D510mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3EtonD510Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:49 | by ThaDafinser