User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.6 Safari/525.13

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 0.2WebKit WinXP 5.2Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 0.2.149.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 0.2WebKit Windows Server 2003desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 0.2.149.6closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 0.2.149closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome Beta 0.2.149.6Webkit 525.13Windows Server 2003desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 0.2.149.6closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeMac OS X 10.5.6Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:50 | by ThaDafinser