User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/11.04 Chromium/11.0.696.68 Chrome/11.0.696.68 Safari/534.24

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chromium 11.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.68closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chromium 11.0WebKit Ubuntu 11.04desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.68closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 11.0.696closeUbuntu 11.4closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chromium 11.0.696.68Webkit 534.24Ubuntu 11.04desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.68closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:50 | by ThaDafinser