User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; ; Linux armv5tejl; U) Opera 8.02 [de_DE] Maemo browser 0.4.34 N770/SU-18

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.02closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
MicroB 0.4Gecko Maemo yes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera SU-18closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.2closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile 8.02 Maemo NokiaN770mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeMaemo NokiaGeneric MaemoFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:51 | by ThaDafinser