User agent detail

MOT-MB200/Blur_Version.0.14.501.MB200.AmericaMovil.en.01 Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.5; xx; MB200 Build/CUPCAKE) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 1.5MotorolaMB200smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 1.5closeAndroid 1.5MotorolaMB200closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Android Browser Webkit 528.5Android 1.5MotorolaCLIQmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 1.5closeAndroid 1.5MotorolaMB200Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:52 | by ThaDafinser