User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; PMP5588C Build/E8HD-ELITE-1280x768) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Safari/535.19

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.2PrestigioPMP5588Ctabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.2.1PrestigioPMP5588Ccloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.2.1PrestigioMultipad 8.0 HDtabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.2PrestigioPMP5588CTabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:52 | by ThaDafinser