User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows Phone 8.0; Trident/6.0; IEMobile/10.0; ARM; Touch; SAMSUNG; SGH-T899M)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
IEMobile 10.0Trident 6.0WinPhone8 8.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
IE Mobile 10.0Trident Windows Phone 8.0SamsungSGH-T899Msmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows Phone 8closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 10.0closeWindows Phone 8.0SamsungSGH-T899Mcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Mobile Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Phone 8.0SamsungAtiv Smobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 10.0closeWindows Phone 8.0SamsungSGH-T899MSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:54 | by ThaDafinser