User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 5.1; zh-cn; BOWAY_V95Pro Build/LMY47D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/6.1 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
QQ Browser 6.1WebKit Android 5.1BowayV95Prosmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 5.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 6.1closeAndroid 5.1BOWAY_V95Procloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
QQ Browser 6.1Webkit 537.36Android 5.1BOWAY_V95Promobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 39closeAndroid 5.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:55 | by ThaDafinser