User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0.2; Amazon Jem Build/LRX22G) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.89 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 5.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 5.0AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9" WiFitabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeAndroid 5.0.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 40.0.2214closeAndroid 5.0.2AmazonJemcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 40Blink 537.36Android 5.0.2AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9"tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 40closeAndroid 5.0Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:55 | by ThaDafinser