User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Polaris 6.2; Brew 3.1.5; en)/240X320 Samsung sam-r631

Detected by 5 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Polaris 6.2 Brew 3.1Samsungsam-r631smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 6.2close Samsungsam-r631closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Polaris 6.2 Brew 3.1.5SamsungMessenger Touch R631mobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungR631Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:55 | by ThaDafinser