User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.1; zh-CN; M353 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/10.2.0.535 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 10.2U3 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 10.2WebKit Android 4.2MeizuMX3smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.2.0closeAndroid 4.2.1M353closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 10.2Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.1MeizuMX3 M353mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 10closeAndroid 4.2MeizuM353Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:57 | by ThaDafinser