User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows Phone 8.1; ARM; Trident/7.0; Touch; rv:11; IEMobile/11.0) like Android 4.1.2; compatible) like iPhone OS 7_0_3 Mac OS X WebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.99 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
IEMobile 11.0Trident 7.0WinPhone8.1 8.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 32.0Blink Windows Phone 8.1AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeiOS closeWindows Phonecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700closeWindows Phone 8.1like Android 4.1.2compatiblecloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 32Trident 7.0Windows Phone 8.1mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 11closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows Phone 8.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:57 | by ThaDafinser